The social conservative movement is continuing its shuffle into being an obsolete movement. Consider the case of Joe the Plumber. Everyone remember him, the guy named Joe, real name Samuel Wurzelbacher, that is a plumber, but not really, that came to fame during the 2008 presidential election? Well, he is back in the news for an interview he gave with Christianity Today on the subject of gay marriage. In the interview Joe said that referring to homosexuals as queer isn’t a slander, because it by definition means “strange and unusual”, which in Mr. Wurzelbacher’s mind is a perfect description of homosexuals. He then goes on to say that his gay friends “know that I wouldn’t have them anywhere near my children”.
Normally I would consider Mr. Wurzelbacher as someone who doesn’t really deserve mention. After all, he is just a man who has tried to extend his 15 minutes of fame into a career, but he doesn’t have any credentials in the world of politics beyond being asked a question. But Rush Limbaugh, who commands on audience of some 20 million listeners, and has become a sort of leader for the conservative movement as of late, recently called him someone who can “articulate conservatism”. He referred to Mr. Wurzelbacher as such the day after his comments regarding homosexuals. In other words, Mr. Limbaugh believes that someone who thinks homosexuals can’t be trusted around children is a perfect spokesman for conservatism.
Such a statement adds explicit support from a powerful conservative figure, and therefore legitimacy (at least amongst those who find Limbaugh legitimate) to Mr. Wurzelbacher’s statement. And yet there is no outcry from any conservative leaders. No conservative leader is willing to stand up to Rush and say they disagree. Now I am not expecting a conservative leader to say that he agrees with homosexuality or gay marriage, but at the very least I would hope that one would object to such hate speech being typical of the conservative stance towards homosexuality.
How long will we as a people stand for this? Aren’t we past the point where educated people refuse to give national platform to someone who believes that homosexuality is something to be feared, something that we need to protect our children against? Whether or not the majority of conservatives agree with Mr. Wurzelbacher and Mr. Limbaugh is not the point. Their silence on the subject, and Mr. Limbaugh’s continued large listenership, is implicit support of a position that is antiquated and hate-filled.
The year is 2009, and yet it is still necessary to tell conservatives that homosexuals are normal people. They are the exact same as straight people. Their sexual orientation is not some looking glass into what type of person they are. There are good, upstanding homosexuals as well as bad, immoral homosexuals, in the same manner that there are both types of heterosexuals. They do not desire special treatment, or special recognition, they only desire to be treated the same as every other person in this country.
The gay struggle for equality in America is the one of the most important human rights campaigns in America right now. It is still accepted to refer to something or someone that is stupid or lame as gay. It is accepted to publicly say that you wouldn’t let homosexuals around your children. It is accepted to believe that homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt because they are unfit to be parents. Homosexuality is a product of being born. That is it. It makes no more sense to discriminate against homosexuals than it does to discriminate against women, minorities, etc, and yet the hate and discrimination continues without a second thought, an ingrained piece of our culture, a person that everyone can join in and discriminate against. Every single person in this country should be against discrimination, in any form, yet there are many unwilling to join in the fight for equal rights for homosexuals.
Let me repeat, I do not expect conservatives to support gay marriage, at least not right now. But I do not believe it is not asking too much for them to turn their backs on those in the conservative movement that feel that blatant discrimination and hate speech against homosexuals is acceptable. Those that make such statements, and anyone who doesn’t believe those statements are a big deal, are un-American. That is not a term lightly thrown around, but is there any other name for someone who doesn’t believe the Founding Fathers were correct in proclaiming that they wished America to be a place where all people were created with “certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”?